Bybit Lazarus Lab Reveals 16 Blockchains Have Built-In Fund-Freezing Code — Decentralization at Risk

A new report from Bybit’s Lazarus Security Lab has sent shockwaves through the crypto industry, revealing that 16 major blockchain networks contain code allowing developers or validators to freeze or restrict user funds.
The discovery challenges the long-held assumption of absolute decentralization, raising serious questions about custody rights, censorship resistance, and trust in supposedly “permissionless” ecosystems.

You can explore more in-depth investigations and ecosystem analyses in our Cryptocurrency News section, where BTCNews.space examines the intersection of blockchain security, transparency, and user control.

🧩 What the Bybit Report Found

Among the affected are Avalanche, BNB Chain, Polygon, Solana, and several Ethereum-compatible sidechains.
While many of these “freeze functions” were originally designed to comply with regulatory requests or recover stolen assets, their presence means that users’ wallets are not always as sovereign as they believe.

“It’s not just about code — it’s about control,” the Lazarus team stated.
“The fact that any centralized actor, validator group, or governance key can freeze funds contradicts the fundamental ethos of decentralization.”

⚠️ Why This Discovery Matters

This revelation exposes a critical trust paradox in the blockchain world:
To comply with global financial regulations and security standards, some chains have embedded administrative kill switches. But these same mechanisms undermine the immutability and censorship resistance that define blockchain technology.

According to recent Bitcoin News commentary, even networks claiming “distributed governance” often rely on multisig wallets or centralized authorities for emergency intervention — effectively creating a backdoor for fund manipulation.

Lazarus Lab found that:

• Some networks allow core developers to pause token transfers unilaterally.
• Others permit validators to collectively decide which wallets are blacklisted.
• A few systems even include KYC-linked revocation mechanisms, directly connecting on-chain identity with wallet access rights.

The implications are enormous for DeFi traders, custodians, and institutional investors who rely on the assumption of full autonomy over their assets.

🔍 Industry Reaction: Transparency vs. Trust

The findings have sparked immediate debate across X (Twitter) and developer forums.
Some blockchain foundations defended the inclusion of freeze functions as “security safeguards”—claiming they are essential in recovering stolen assets and protecting users during smart-contract exploits.

However, crypto purists and security analysts argue the opposite:
these mechanisms are the antithesis of decentralized finance, effectively turning open blockchains into semi-centralized financial networks.

“If you can freeze it, you control it,” wrote crypto researcher Adam Calloway.
“No amount of marketing can hide a master key.”

The Lazarus Lab report recommends that users review each chain’s governance documentation and audit reports before engaging in large transactions, staking, or liquidity provision.

🧠 Technical Breakdown: How “Freeze Functions” Work

Most of these freezing systems rely on smart-contract-level functions like pause(), blacklist(), or revoke(), controlled by privileged addresses.
On networks such as BNB Chain and Avalanche, these contracts can be executed by validators or governance councils in response to “security incidents.”

Meanwhile, Polygon and Solana use upgradeable contract architectures, meaning administrators can replace or alter smart contracts retroactively — giving them effective fund-control power.

Analysts at Glassnode and CryptoQuant have begun tracing freeze-trigger transactions to understand how often these mechanisms have actually been used. Preliminary data show at least 42 documented fund freezes since mid-2023, primarily tied to hack investigations and exchange compliance actions.

According to recent Ethereum News insights, Ethereum itself remains structurally decentralized, but Layer-2 solutions and bridge protocols introduce new centralized dependencies that could compromise that principle.

🔮 The Bigger Picture: A Decentralization Stress Test

The Lazarus findings may represent a turning point for blockchain transparency.
The industry now faces a difficult choice:
either embrace complete autonomy with higher user risk, or retain control mechanisms that make the ecosystem more compliant — but less trustless.

Some projects, like TON and Polkadot, are exploring on-chain consensus-based freeze approvals, which require supermajority validator votes rather than unilateral action.
This hybrid model could provide a balance between safety and sovereignty — a concept that might define the next phase of blockchain evolution.

As digital asset regulation tightens globally, developers and investors alike must reconsider what “decentralization” truly means — and who holds the power when things go wrong.

Our creator. creates amazing NFT collections! 
Support the editors - Bitcoin_Man (ETH) / Bitcoin_Man (TON)

Pi Network (Guide)is a new digital currency developed by Stanford PhDs with over 55 million participants worldwide. To get your Pi, follow this link https://minepi.com/Tsybko and use my username (Tsybko) as the invite code.

Binance: Use this link to sign up and get $100 free and 10% off your first months Binance Futures fees (Terms and Conditions).

Bitget: Use this link Use the Rewards Center and win up to 5027 USDT!(Review)

Bybit: Use this link (all possible discounts on commissions and bonuses up to $30,030 included) If you register through the application, then at the time of registration simply enter in the reference: WB8XZ4 - (manual)